Fong et al v. Grenville-Germain Calgary Limited Partnership McLennan Ross acted when it comes to directors of the firm which constructed within an action commenced with respect to the owners of the domestic condominiums for misrepresentations and deficiencies.
Hudyma v. LoyaltyOne, Inc. et al McLennan Ross acted for an worldwide transport provider with regards to an action involving a sizable travel facilitator while the incorporation of gas surcharges within the calculation of costs.
Kilroy v. a okay payday loans inc. et al it was A uk Columbia course action against an amount of cash advance operations, by which McLennan Ross represented three associated with Defendants. The Plaintiff discontinued its action against our consumers. Korte v. Cormie McLennan Ross had been counsel into the auditors in this action, a proceeding that is“representative before the utilization of course proceedings legislation in Alberta, that was brought on the behalf of most of the investors in 2 subsidiaries for the Principal Group, an economic conglomerate that failed. The situation had been settled ahead of exams for breakthrough.
Lahaie v. Goodyear this is a course action against Goodyear. McLennan Ross assisted as Alberta counsel in commencing the course action in Alberta during the request of British Columbia counsel, that has currently commenced an action in British Columbia. The problem had been settled in British Columbia.
MacKinnon v. National cash Mart et al This course action had been brought https://installmentpersonalloans.org/payday-loans-ny/ in British Columbia from the major operators into the cash advance industry. McLennan Ross had been counsel to at least one associated with Defendants. We had been effective in opposing a credit card applicatoin for official official official certification, following that the Plaintiff discontinued this action as against our customers.
Nette v. Stiles et al In this class that is proposed, the Plaintiff advertised from the Alberta national while the College of Chiropractors that one therapy ended up being harmful and may never be allowed into the Province of Alberta. McLennan Ross represented a Defendant and brought a software to really have the claim dismissed just before certification. The Plaintiff discontinued against our customer prior to the application had been argued.
O’Keefe v. Menu Foods working Limited Partnership McLennan Ross ended up being associated with a course action brought by owners alleging any particular one regarding the major suppliers of pet meals in Alberta didn’t have quality settings in position which triggered the loss of household animals from tainted meals. This litigation ended up being solved by settlement among the events.
Pauli et al v. Ace INA Insurance et al McLennan Ross acted as Alberta counsel for just one associated with Defendants in this step which sought an interpretation for the Insurance Act and a return of any deductible charged where there clearly was a loss that is total of under consideration. The action ended up being remedied in preference of the Defendants after an overview determination of a true point of legislation. Ramias v. Johnson McLennan Ross ended up being counsel into the Plaintiffs in this class that is putative which reported investment fraudulence and securities violations. It had been discontinued after settlement using the Defendants.
Tschritter v. Instaloans Financial possibilities Centres McLennan Ross had been counsel to your Defendants in this class action brought against a loan that is payday within the Province of Alberta, that was remedied within the general settlement regarding the Ontario and Alberta course proceedings against our consumers (see Bruley and Downey above).
Western Canada Buying Centres v. Dutton McLennan Ross acted for starters for the defendants in this class that is longstanding for many years.
Bank of America et al Class actions are filed against Visa, MasterCard, and an amount of finance institutions in British Columbia, Alberta, Quebec and Ontario, claiming losings with respect to Canadian merchants who accepted re payment for items or services by means of Visa or MasterCard charge cards associated with solution costs and limitations on company methods that have been needed so that you can accept such repayments. McLennan Ross will act as Alberta representative for counsel for starters of this Defendant banking institutions. The issues are susceptible to case that is coordinated and are also ongoing.